The New York Times is starting to look into how generative AI can be used in its newsroom. Still, it emphasises that the main reporting tasks will continue to be handled by people.
The esteemed publication is currently in the process of assembling a dedicated team tailored for the integration of generative AI within its newsroom.
Zach Seward, who’s newly on board to lead AI projects, announced on Threads that they’re putting together a team. This crew’s main job? To test out how generative AI and other fancy machine-learning tricks can lend a hand in reporting and in shaping how the Times shows up for its readers.
“We’re building a team at the @nytimes focused on prototyping uses of generative AI and other machine-learning techniques to help with reporting and how The Times is presented to readers,”
According to Seward, job postings for various positions will be available this week, including roles for a machine-learning engineer, software engineer, designer, and editor.
Key Points
- AI Newsroom Team Formation: The Times is assembling a dedicated team, including roles such as a machine learning engineer, software engineer, designer, and editors, to prototype and implement AI-driven solutions in their newsroom.
- Skunkworks Approach: The new team is envisioned to operate as an internal innovation hub, collaborating across various departments to evolve prototypes into fully functional tools and applications for journalistic and operational use.
- Commitment to Human Journalism: Despite the integration of AI technologies, The New York Times emphasises its commitment to ensuring that its journalism will continue to be conducted by human professionals, underscoring the value of human expertise and judgment in the journalistic process.
Comprising roles such as machine learning engineers, software engineers, designers, and seasoned editors, this team is tasked with prototyping and implementing AI-driven solutions while upholding the publication’s journalistic standards.
Adopting a skunkworks approach, The New York Times envisions the new team as an internal innovation hub. It will collaborate across departments, refining prototypes into fully functional tools and applications for both journalistic and operational purposes.
However, amidst this technological evolution, The Times remains steadfast in its commitment to human journalism. It underscored the indispensability of human expertise and judgment in the journalistic process.
Despite the integration of AI technologies, the publication reassures its readers that its core reporting tasks will continue to be handled by human professionals.
Threads user eddiemajor_ said, “It’s great to see the Times so proactive on AI. I’m working on some similar—albeit much smaller scale—proposals for ‘newsroom AI’ here in Australia,”
Accuracy Of AI-Generated Content
As major publications increasingly embrace AI, there arises a pressing need to address ethical considerations, maintain journalistic integrity, and ensure the accuracy of AI-generated content
The New York Times’ forward-thinking approach signifies a delicate balance between harnessing the potential of AI and preserving the irreplaceable essence of human storytelling.
The Times has had a bumpy ride with generative AI. They were among the first news outlets to say no to OpenAI’s web crawler trying to grab their stuff from the internet.
Last year things got even stickier when they decided to take legal action against both OpenAI and Microsoft, who happens to be OpenAI’s major investor.
The New York Times initiated a lawsuit alleging copyright infringement due to their AI technologies, ChatGPT and other platforms, being trained with millions of articles from The Times.
The legal battle could set a precedent for copyright law in relation to generative AI technologies and have significant implications for the news industry, which is adapting to changes in digital media consumption.
As major publications adopt AI, there will be an increased focus on addressing ethical considerations, maintaining journalistic integrity, and ensuring the accuracy of AI-generated content.
